Is “Quiet Firing” the right response to “Quiet Quitting”?

Published on May 31st, 2023

Quiet Firing and Quiet Quitting are not mere HR buzzwords, these terms have become a reality in the workplace. While quiet quitting is a strategy by employees to express disengagement from their jobs, quiet firing is the practice of letting go of employees without any prior information. The question that arises is - Is quiet firing the employer’s response to quiet quitting and is it right? Let’s find out. 

Understanding Quiet Quitting:

Quiet quitting occurs when employees disengage from their work and organization without expressing their dissatisfaction or intentions to leave. They may exhibit a lack of enthusiasm, decreased productivity, reduced collaboration, and increased absenteeism. Quiet quitters often avoid conflicts or discussions about their dissatisfaction, making it challenging for employers to identify and address the underlying issues.

What is Quiet Firing?

Quiet firing, as a response to quiet quitting, involves discreetly letting go of employees who exhibit signs of disengagement. Instead of proactively addressing the reasons behind an employee's disengagement, the employer chooses to terminate the individual quietly, without creating disruptions or drawing attention to the departure. The goal is to minimize the impact on team morale and maintain a sense of stability within the organization.

The Merits of Quiet Firing:

  • Preservation of team morale: By quietly removing disengaged employees, organizations can prevent a negative impact on team dynamics and maintain a positive work environment.
  • Avoiding a toxic work culture: Addressing employees who have already disengaged and are not contributing positively can prevent their negative influence from spreading to others.
  • Efficiency and productivity: Removing disengaged employees can free up resources and provide opportunities for new talent that may be more motivated and productive.

The Drawbacks of Quiet Firing:

  • Missed opportunities for improvement: By quietly firing disengaged employees, organizations may miss the chance to address systemic issues that contribute to employee disengagement. This could lead to a cycle of repeated quiet quitting among other employees.
  • Lack of transparency and trust: Quiet firing can erode trust between employees and the organization. It may create a perception that the employer values secrecy over open communication and problem-solving.
  • Legal and ethical concerns: In some jurisdictions, quiet firing without proper documentation and justification may raise legal and ethical issues, potentially resulting in legal repercussions for the organization.

Alternative Strategies to Address Quiet Quitting:

  • Encourage open communication: Foster an environment where employees feel comfortable expressing their concerns, ideas, and feedback. Regular check-ins and feedback sessions can help identify and address any underlying issues before they escalate.
  • Create a positive work culture: Cultivate a work environment that promotes employee engagement, recognition, and growth. Provide opportunities for skill development, empowerment, and work-life balance.
  • Conduct stay interviews: Instead of waiting for employees to disengage, conduct stay interviews to proactively identify factors that contribute to their job satisfaction and engagement. This can help prevent quiet quitting before it even occurs.
  • Employee development and support: Offer professional development opportunities, mentorship programs, and support systems to help employees overcome challenges and maintain motivation.
  • Exit interviews: When employees do leave, conduct exit interviews to gain insights into their reasons for disengagement. These interviews can provide valuable feedback to address issues and improve the work environment for current and future employees.

So, is quiet firing the right response to quiet quitting?

On the one hand, it can be seen as a cost-effective way to get rid of an employee who is no longer pulling their weight. It can also be seen as a way to send a message to other employees that poor performance will not be tolerated.

On the other hand, quiet firing can have a number of negative consequences. It can create a hostile work environment, demoralize other employees, and damage the company's reputation. It can also lead to legal problems if the employee feels that they have been wrongfully terminated.

Ultimately, whether or not quiet firing is the right response to quiet quitting depends on a number of factors, such as the severity of the employee's performance problems, the company's culture, and the potential legal consequences.

If an employer is considering quiet firing an employee, it is important to weigh the pros and cons carefully. It is also important to follow all applicable legal procedures to avoid potential problems.

Here are some tips for handling quiet quitting and quiet firing:

  • Talk to the employee. Before taking any action, it is important to talk to the employee about their performance problems. This gives the employee a chance to explain their behavior and make changes.
  • Document the problem. If the employee's performance does not improve, it is important to document the problem. This includes keeping track of missed deadlines, poor quality work, and other performance issues.
  • Provide the employee with a performance improvement plan. If the employee's performance problems are serious, the employer may need to provide them with a performance improvement plan. This is a written document that outlines the employee's specific performance goals and the steps they need to take to improve.
  • Follow the company's termination policy. If the employee's performance does not improve after receiving a performance improvement plan, the employer may need to terminate their employment. It is important to follow the company's termination policy to avoid potential legal problems.

While the question remains unasnwered due to the discreet nature of these workplace trends, one thing is sure that neither quiet quitting, nor quiet firing are ethical practices and both employers and employees should engage in a proper communication channel to avoid such events from happening. 

Experience the power of EasySource, the ultimate talent sourcing tool designed to connect you with the most suitable candidates and facilitate meaningful engagement. By leveraging EasySource, you can effectively eliminate the occurrence of quiet quitting or the need for quiet firing when you discover and engage with the right candidates.

Related Reads:



Radhika Sarraf

Radhika Sarraf is a content specialist and a woman of many passions who currently works at HireQuotient, a leading recruitment SaaS company. She is a versatile writer with experience in creating compelling articles, blogs, social media posts, and marketing collaterals.

Scroll Image

Hire the best without stress

Ask us how

Never Miss The Updates

We cover all recruitment, talent analytics, L&D, DEI, pre-employment, candidate screening, and hiring tools. Join our force & subscribe now!

Like/ dislike something or want to co-author an article? Drop us a note!

Stay On Top Of Everything In HR